At SIS all curriculum overall expectations outlined by the Ontario Ministry of Education are accounted for instruction and accordingly for evaluation. A student’s achievement of the overall expectations is evaluated on the basis of his or her achievement of related specific expectations. The overall expectations are broad in nature, and the specific expectations define the particular content or scope of the knowledge and skills referred to in the overall expectations. SIS Teachers will determine which specific expectations should be used to evaluate achievement of the overall expectations, and which ones will be accounted for in instruction and assessment but not necessarily evaluated. Likewise, SIS Teachers develop learning goals based on the curriculum expectations and share them with students through the Course Syllabus.
SIS teachers will obtain assessment information through a variety of means, which may include formal and informal observations, discussions, learning conversations, questioning, conferences, homework, tasks done in groups, demonstrations, projects, portfolios, developmental practices, performances, peer and self-assessments, self-reflections, essays, and tests. SIS teachers will provide ongoing, timely and constructive feedback to support student learning and also to verify that the work presented actually belongs to the student enrolled.
Evidence of SIS student achievement for evaluation is continually collected on every lesson from three different sources: observations, conversations, and student products. Observations are gathered from discussion areas or video evidence. Effective conversations will be fostered through apps that enable forums, discussions and feedback. Student products may be in the form of tests or exams and/or assignments for evaluation. Assignments for evaluation may include rich performance tasks, demonstrations, projects, and/or essays, contributions to online discussions, completion of online assignments, portfolio submissions, projects and presentations, website development, electronic presentations, Online collaborative projects, oral presentations, interviews, dissertations, Student-led conferencing, tests, rubrics, anecdotal comments, checklists and self- and peer-assessment.
They do not include ongoing homework that students do in order to consolidate their knowledge and skills or to prepare for the next class. Assignments for evaluation may involve group projects as long as each student’s work within the group project is evaluated independently and assigned an individual mark, as opposed to a common group mark. The evaluation of student learning is the responsibility of the teacher and do not include the judgement of the student or of the student’s peers.
Achievement Chart
SIS student learning is assessed and evaluated in a balanced manner with respect to the four levels of the achievement chart, defined as follows:
Level 1 represents achievement that falls much below the provincial standard. The student demonstrates the specified knowledge and skills with limited effectiveness. Students must work at significantly improving learning in specific areas, as necessary, if they are to be successful in the next grade/course. It is obtained if performance is under 59% of marks.
Level 2 represents achievement that approaches the provincial standard. The student demonstrates the specified knowledge and skills with some effectiveness. Students performing at this level need to work on identified learning gaps to ensure future success. It is obtained if performance is between 60% and 69% of marks.
Level 3 represents the provincial standard for achievement. The student demonstrates the specified knowledge and skills with considerable effectiveness. Parents of students achieving at level 3 can be confident that their children will be prepared for work in subsequent grades/courses. It is attained if performance is between 70% and 79% of marks.
Level 4 identifies achievement that surpasses the provincial standard. The student demonstrates the specified knowledge and skills with a high degree of effectiveness. However, achievement at level 4 does not mean that the student has achieved expectations beyond those specified for the grade/course. It is reached if performance is over 80% of marks
Categories of Knowledge and Skills
he following are the four broad areas of knowledge and skills within which SIS subject/course expectations are organized. The categories are to be considered interrelated, reflecting the wholeness and interconnectedness of learning
- Knowledge and Understanding: Subject-specific content acquired in each grade/course (knowledge), and the comprehension of its meaning and significance (understanding)
- Thinking: The use of critical and creative thinking skills and/or processes
- Communication: The conveying of meaning through various forms
- Application: The use of knowledge and skills to make connections within and between various contexts
Learning Skills and Work Habits
The development of learning skills and work habits is an integral part of a SIS student’s learning. To the extent possible, however, the evaluation of learning skills and work habits, apart from any that may be included as part of a curriculum expectation in a subject or course, should not be considered in the determination of a student’s grades. Assessing, evaluating, and reporting on the achievement of curriculum expectations and on the demonstration of learning skills and work habits separately allows teachers to provide information to the parents and student that is specific to each of the two areas of achievement.
The Learning Skills and Work Habits are Responsibility, Organization, Independent Work, Collaboration, Initiative and Self-regulation, and will be evaluated and reported as E – Excellent, G Good, S Satisfactory, N Needs improvement.